Skip to content

In the zone

After a surge in prices yesterday, the RUT (IWM) is trading in the resistance zone I mentioned earlier.  Reasonable risk reward for a short here.  IF we break much higher in the major indices (over 1100 SPX, for example) then we are likely headed to new intermediate term highs.

In the resistance zone

In the resistance zone

Panem et Circenses

See the definition below and make your own conclusions….  :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bread_and_circuses

Wrap up to the week

Weekly cross confirmed.

New trend? Or extended period of consolidation?

 The two charts above depict the 13 and 34 Exponential moving averages.  On the $RUT, the averages finished the week with a bearish cross.  Judging by the close of Friday, I would expect this index to test 600-635 area early next week.  This would be another pivotal area to consider a short position with minimal risk.

The SPX chart above demonstrates how the initial cross can indicate the begining of a period of consolidation.  The SPX close Friday was not as positiove, but still indicates to me that we could test the 1100 area with little difficulty early next week.

From www.carlfutia.blogspot.com

The chart above was printed Wednesday and shows the potential for an Inverted Head and Shoulders pattern developing in the SPX.  The challenge on this pattern is 1130.  A solid break above this level sends stocks to 1250 (which has been Carl Futia’s target for a while now.)

Net, net:  I would be slightly bullish up to the levels described above, and prepared for more weakness once they are reached.  A breach of 1130 on SPX means new near term highs are likely.

Stocks struggle as Treasuries lead the way

 

10-year Treasury Yields

 Ten year treasury yields as represented by the index $TNX (above) are falling off a cliff.  The Treasury market is much larger in size than the stock market and is typically first to present signs of trouble in the markets.  Yields hit extreme lows in December of 2008, and even though the stock market made new lows in March of 2009, yields did not.  When you compare where we are in yields today and where the stock market is in relation, it seems as though bonds think stocks should go lower.

The 'real' Death Cross

 Above is a weekly chart of the Russell Index.  The 13 and 34 period Exponential moving averages are about to cross.  They have already crossed in the daily.

The 'real' Death Cross

Same with the SPX (above).  Weekly EMAs are crossing.

Business videos worth watching

Below you will find the links to a few episodes of The Pittsburgh Business Report.  This is an independent program started by me and my business partner, Al Marschke.  Have a look and tell us what you think!

Personal Finances:  A lifetime of Investing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qso96cIK_n8

Tax law changes coming soon:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkdIH4rGxF8&feature=related

Local grower, Soergel Orchards:  Future of Family Farming:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G30Nk-QR_Tg

Managed Futures with Pat Lafferty of CTG:

Part One:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSMYE4AoIYY&feature=pyv&ad=5153405870&kw=futures

Part Two:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KtqIJnAg6k&feature=related

Still hovering around pivots – A breakout coming?

 

SPX trading around the 200-day MA

 

Several days of range trading SPY

 

A break below 640 today?

Interest rates make new lows, stocks still holding ‘Death Cross’ gains

The July Employment report was released today.  Although the headline number was negative, (a loss of 131,000 jobs), the private sector portion showed a gain of 71,000.  This number was lower than most analysts anticipated, but it is the second month of gains in private sector employment.  (June added 31,000 private sector jobs.)  The overall feeling about this data is that we are showing moderate gains in employment in a low interest rate environment.  This fact keeps the Fed on hold, and keeps money flowing toward stocks. 

Right now, support for the SPX is at 1115, the 200-day moving average. 

If you recall from my last post, the $RUT is an important index to watch as it consists largely of smaller financial institutions.  With interest rates as low as they are, the economic environment becomes increasingly more challenging to a smaller banks’ bottom line.  Over the past few days, the 50-day and 200-day moving averages have crossed to the downside.  There is strong support at the 640 level as a result of their convergence, and cross. 

I would consider the stock market bullish at this stage with 1115 SPX and 640 RUT to be important pivotal areas.

Another test

The major indices are threatening a breakout higher.  Currently, the SPX is trading right at it’s 200-day Moving Average.  I expect some selling here (20 points or so) then perhaps a run to new near term highs.

1100 area is resistance for now

The yield curve: A picture of disinflation? Or forecasting deflation?

2 year yields hit all time low

There is still a nice slope to the yield curve, even as 2 year yields hit a new record low.  CPI report released Friday declined by 0.1%.  This is the third straight month of declining overall CPI.  While the core CPI increased by 0.1% for June, the Y-oY rate  held at 0.9% for the third month in a row:

Core CPI declining - not negative

 More fodder on the report:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-16/treasuries-head-for-weekly-advance-as-report-shows-increase-in-core-prices.html

Source CPI data:

http://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/data/US-Inflation/mcpi.cfm?DCS.nav=Local

Source CPI chart:

http://www.clevelandfed.org/research/data/US-Inflation/chartsdata/printchart.cfm

The above data was the kickoff to a down market on Friday.  The media attributed most of the decline to the Michigan Consumer Sentiment report.  The June number came in at 66.5, down from 76 in June, and lower than the median estimate of 74.

SPX down 2.88% Friday

The Markets were down overall, with most averages still trading below their 200-day moving average AND their 50-day moving average.  The index I am paying the most attention to is the Russell 2000:

Still no 'death cross'

This is a small cap index, with a heavy weight in small financial services companies.   When I look at the yield curve, and I see 2-year rates at 0.6% or so, I begin to worry about the health of these smaller institutions.  The primary reason being their cost of funding, which is higher than that of  larger banks’.

An explanation from economist Warren Mosler:

“Small banks, already penalized with a higher cost of funds than the large banks (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/warren-mosler/response-to-president-oba_b_413292.html) have more recently been forced to contract due to ‘wholesale funding’ restrictions being imposed by the regulators.

 
Bank regulators distinguish between what they call ‘retail’ and ‘wholesale’ funding, and have set limits of small banks for ‘wholesale’ funding.  This policy is meant to reduce the liquidity risk of a bank not being able to roll over its funding should depositors decide to take their dollars to another bank.  The theory is that ‘retail’ deposits are ‘sticky’ and less likely to move to another bank, while ‘wholesale’ deposits are more likely to move.  And the ‘better’ the ‘account relationship’ the more likely the funds are to stay with the bank.  Oddly, when I inquired if the maturity of the deposit is a consideration the regulators responded ‘no.’  So that means a 10 year CD obtained through a broker is considered a wholesale deposit, which must be limited, while money market deposits from a local depositors that can leave the next day are the core retail deposits required by the regulators for ‘stability.’
 
But apart from this obvious regulatory failure to recognize what’s more stable and what’s less stable for individual banks, there is also a highly problematic macro issue.  In the banking system as a whole, loans create deposits, meaning that for each loan made by a bank (bank assets) there exists a bank deposit of the same amount originally created at the time of the loan as that bank’s liability.  In short, for the banking system as a whole, loans equal deposits.
 
The problem is that money center banks attract more of these total deposits than the small banks in the normal course of business.  That leaves the small banks short of deposits by an equal amount.  This is easily resolved by the small banks needing funding borrowing the excess funds held by the large banks.  And if the large banks decide to keep their excess funds at the Federal Reserve Bank the small banks can simply borrow from the Fed to cover their shortage.  In any case the total funding of the banking system remains equal to the total loans outstanding, with the Fed acting as a ‘broker’ to facilitate system wide liquidity.  However, when regulators restrict this ‘wholesale funding’ between banks, and also deem borrowings from the Fed ‘wholesale funding,’ they put powerful forces in place that force the small banks to either pay higher rates to attract deposits from the large banks, which is often impossible as large corporate customers can’t deal with small banks, or force the small banks to cut back on lending to reduce their dependence on wholesale funding.  
 
The net result is a misguided regulatory policy that is both increasing the cost of funds to small banks and forcing small banks to cut back on lending.  
 
The remedy is quite simple, have the Fed offer funding (fed funds) to all member banks at it’s target interest rate, which is the rate the Fed desires to in fact be the cost of funds for its banking system as a matter of public policy.  In any case, bank borrowing and lending is rightly constrained by capital and other regulatory requirements, and not available funding, which is always attainable at a price.  Using the liability side of banking for market discipline, as is currently the practice for small banks, is always evidence of a lack of understanding of banking fundamentals and counter to further public purpose. ”
 
More to follow soon.

Back to the future

The stock market has rallied 10 percent off the lows made just a few days ago.  Now we are challenging the resistance zone yet again.  IF we are headed to new lows (SPX 1000), this is the area to consider selling.

SPX at resistance

SPX (above)  There was a nice divergence at the lows July 6th.  We will see if the market is strong enough to break through 1100.